Adept vs Decagon: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Decagon — specs
| Spec | Adept | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Decagon in 2026?+
Pick Adept if its specific capabilities (Browser, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Decagon if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Decagon for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Decagon?+
Both Adept and Decagon start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Decagon?+
Both Adept and Decagon are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.