Browser-driving agent that completes web tasks autonomously — booking, shopping, research.
Adept vs Sycamorewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Sycamore — specs
| Spec | Adept | Sycamore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 9
- Polish
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 6
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
- +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
- +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
- −Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
- −No public pricing — sales-led motion
- −Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Agent OS core
- +Standard integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Trust + memory layers
- +Strategic CS
- +On-prem deployment
- +Dedicated engineering
- +Custom integrations
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sycamore →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Sycamore in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Sycamore?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sycamore starts at Subscription. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sycamore?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Adept and Sycamore also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- BrowserTool useVisionMemoryDemo · hover to play
Claude with computer-use capability — sees the screen, moves cursor, types, navigates apps autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemory
Demo · hover to playPersonal AI agent that browses the web for you — books flights, fills forms, completes tasks autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemoryDemo · hover to play