Webタスクを自律的に完了するブラウザ操作AIエージェント — 予約、購入、リサーチに対応。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to play
Adept vs Sycamorewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
BrowserTool useMemoryVision
Adept vs Sycamore — specs
| Spec | Adept | Sycamore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 4
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Sycamore
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Adept
メリット
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
デメリット
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Sycamore
メリット
- +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
- +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
- +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
デメリット
- −Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
- −No public pricing — sales-led motion
- −Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget
Pricing
Adept
Enterprise preview
カスタム
Enterprise pilots
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
Sycamore
Team
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Agent OS core
- +Standard integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Trust + memory layers
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +On-prem deployment
- +Dedicated engineering
- +Custom integrations
Which one should you pick?
Adept
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Sycamore
Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sycamore →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Sycamore in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Sycamore?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sycamore starts at Subscription. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sycamore?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Adept and Sycamore also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
画面を認識し、カーソルを動かし、入力や操作を自律的に実行するコンピューター操作機能を備えたClaude。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to playあなたに代わってウェブを閲覧するパーソナルAIエージェント — フライトの予約、フォームの入力、タスクの自律的な完了が可能です。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Adept · alternatives to Sycamore
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison