Browser-driving agent that completes web tasks autonomously — booking, shopping, research.
BrowserTool useVisionMemory
Demo · hover to play
Adept vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
BrowserTool useMemoryVision
Adept vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Adept | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 9
- Polish
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Adept
Pros
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
Cons
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Torq
Pros
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
Cons
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Adept
Enterprise preview
Custom
Enterprise pilots
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
Torq
Pro
Custom
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
Recommended
Enterprise
Custom
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
Custom
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint. Pick Torq if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Torq?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Torq starts at Subscription. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Torq?+
Both Adept and Torq are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Adept and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Claude with computer-use capability — sees the screen, moves cursor, types, navigates apps autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemory
Demo · hover to playPersonal AI agent that browses the web for you — books flights, fills forms, completes tasks autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemoryDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Adept · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison