Artisan Ava vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
AI BDR that researches, drafts and sends outbound at human-quality.
Artisan Ava vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Artisan Ava | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $199 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Outbound quality at well-tuned settings is indistinguishable from a competent SDR
- +Strong CRM sync — pushes activity to Salesforce / HubSpot automatically
- +AIAGENTS coupon eases first-year cost on $199+ tier
- −Wrong-tuned, ships spam at scale — calibrate carefully week 1–2
- −Built for SMB volume; enterprise sales cycles need a different motion
- −Starter tier rate limits trip up high-velocity teams quickly
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +1 seat
- +500 contacts/mo
- +LinkedIn + email outreach
- +3 seats
- +2,000 contacts/mo
- +CRM sync
- +Reply detection
- +Volume contacts
- +Multi-domain
- +Custom AB testing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Artisan Ava if its specific capabilities (Browser, Tool use) match what you need.
Claim AIAGENTSAffiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Artisan Ava or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Artisan Ava if its specific capabilities (Browser, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Artisan Ava for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Artisan Ava and Magic.dev?+
Artisan Ava starts at Subscription · from $199; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Artisan Ava or Magic.dev?+
Both Artisan Ava and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.