Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Augment Code vs Torqwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
Augment Code vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class context engine (200K tokens) — handles monoliths competitors choke on
- +Native AGENTS.md spec-driven workflow with multi-agent "Intent" orchestration
- +70.6% on SWE-Bench Verified — top of the public coding-agent leaderboard
- −Enterprise focus = pricier than Cursor for solo devs
- −Less hands-off than fully-autonomous Devin/Factory Droid
- −Web/UI changes ship slower than IDE-first competitors
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
- +25 messages/month
- +VS Code + JetBrains
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited messages
- +200K Context Engine
- +Private repos
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated CS
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Pick Augment Code if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Augment Code →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Torq?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Torq starts at Subscription. Augment Code is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- CodeTool useRAGMemoryDemo · hover to play
AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryDemo · hover to playGitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemoryDemo · hover to play