Cresta vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Conversational AI agent assist for contact centers — coaches reps and automates after-call work in real time.
Cresta vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Cresta | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Voice, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class real-time coaching — recommendations during the call
- +Auto-summarizes calls + drafts after-call work, saving reps 5+ min per call
- +Strong deployments at Fortune 500 contact centers
- −Enterprise-only — minimum seat counts in the hundreds
- −Implementation requires conversation-data training (4–8 weeks)
- −Augments humans rather than replacing them — different positioning than fully autonomous tier
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Real-time agent assist
- +Conversation intelligence
- +After-call work automation
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Cresta or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Cresta if its specific capabilities (Voice, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Cresta for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Cresta and Magic.dev?+
Both Cresta and Magic.dev start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Cresta or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.