Cursor Agent vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Background agent that drives the Cursor editor across multi-file changes.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Cursor Agent vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Cursor Agent | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $20 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class editor-native UX — agent and inline tab-complete in the same tool
- +Lowest friction to start at $20/month
- +Cursor itself is the most-used editor among working engineers in 2026
- −Sessions don't survive a restart cleanly — long-running work breaks
- −Planning horizon is shorter than Devin's
- −Background-agent quotas can throttle on busy days
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Limited agent runs
- +Full editor features
- +Community support
- +Unlimited agent runs
- +All Pro models
- +Background agents
- +Priority support
- +Everything in Pro
- +Admin dashboard
- +SSO
- +Usage analytics
- +SOC 2
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Cursor Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Cursor Agent →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Cursor Agent or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Cursor Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Cursor Agent for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Cursor Agent and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Cursor Agent starts at Subscription · from $20; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Cursor Agent or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Cursor Agent and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.