Decagon vs Lavender: 2026 comparison
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Decagon vs Lavender — specs
| Spec | Decagon | Lavender |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 65 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
- +Real-time email scoring inside Gmail/Outlook genuinely improves cold-email reply rates
- +Used by tens of thousands of SDRs — battle-tested in real outbound
- +Manager dashboards make team-wide email coaching measurable
- −Augments humans rather than automating outbound end-to-end
- −Best for teams using a real engagement platform (Salesloft/Outreach) underneath
- −Browser extension UX occasionally lags on heavy email days
Pricing
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
- +5 emails/mo
- +Basic scoring
- +Unlimited scoring
- +Real-time coaching
- +Personalization data
- +Team coaching analytics
- +Manager dashboards
- +Custom playbooks
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Pick Lavender if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Lavender →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or Lavender in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Lavender if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and Lavender for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and Lavender?+
Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier; Lavender starts at Subscription · from $29. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or Lavender?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.