Decagon vs Lindy: 2026 comparison
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Decagon vs Lindy — specs
| Spec | Decagon | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $49 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, Voice |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
Pricing
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or Lindy in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Lindy if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and Lindy for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and Lindy?+
Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier; Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or Lindy?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.