Decagon vs Martin: 2026 comparison
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Your personal AI chief of staff for inbox, calendar and life admin.
Decagon vs Martin — specs
| Spec | Decagon | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 70 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, Voice |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
- +AGENTS15 coupon makes the math obvious — $21/mo forever
- +Strong on Apple ecosystem (iMessage native)
- +Voice-memo intake feels effortless on iOS
- −Microsoft 365 integration is the weak spot
- −No team plan; truly a personal assistant only
- −Limited custom workflow builder vs Lindy
Pricing
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
- +Inbox + calendar
- +Voice memo intake
- +iMessage integration
- +AGENTS15 coupon: $21/mo forever
- +Higher message limits
- +Custom workflows
- +Priority support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Claim AGENTS15Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or Martin in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and Martin for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and Martin?+
Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier; Martin starts at Subscription · from $25. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or Martin?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.