Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Dust vs Numericwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Dust vs Numeric — specs
| Spec | Dust | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing
- 9
- Polish
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
Which one should you pick?
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Numeric →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Numeric in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Numeric for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Numeric?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Numeric?+
Both Dust and Numeric are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and Numeric also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Demo · hover to playVisual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to play