Fireflies.ai vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Conversation-intelligence agent for sales and CS — transcribes, scores, and syncs calls to your CRM.
Fireflies.ai vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Fireflies.ai | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $10 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Voice, RAG, Memory, Tool use | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Jan 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Strongest conversation-intelligence and CRM integration in the category
- +60+ languages of transcription, leading the category for global teams
- +Generous free tier (800 min/mo) — easy to evaluate before buying
- −Less polished personal note-taking UX than Otter
- −Sentiment analysis still occasionally misclassifies sarcasm or context
- −Privacy controls require careful configuration per meeting
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +800 min/mo
- +AI summaries
- +8000 min/mo
- +60+ languages
- +CRM sync
- +Conversation intelligence
- +Topic tracking
- +Advanced analytics
- +Unlimited transcription
- +SSO
- +Dedicated CS
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Fireflies.ai if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Fireflies.ai →Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Fireflies.ai or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Fireflies.ai if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Fireflies.ai for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Fireflies.ai and Magic.dev?+
Fireflies.ai starts at Freemium · from $10; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Fireflies.ai or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.