Fixie vs Make.com Agents: 2026 comparison
Build durable agents that act on your internal data — open framework.
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Fixie vs Make.com Agents — specs
| Spec | Fixie | Make.com Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 83 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 8 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Real multi-agent primitives — planner + workers + reviewer out of the box
- +Strong for internal-tool agents over your own data
- +Permissive license; auditable end-to-end
- −Framework, not a finished product — engineering effort to ship anything
- −Smaller community than LangChain / LlamaIndex
- −Cloud pricing not yet published — usage-based and opaque
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
Pricing
- +Apache-2.0 framework
- +Self-host
- +Bring your own models + data
- +Hosted runtime
- +Multi-agent orchestration
- +Observability
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
Which one should you pick?
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Fixie →Pick Make.com Agents if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Fixie or Make.com Agents in 2026?+
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Make.com Agents if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Fixie for primary work and Make.com Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Fixie and Make.com Agents?+
Fixie starts at Free · OSS; Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9. Fixie is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Fixie or Make.com Agents?+
Both Fixie and Make.com Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.