Granola vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Meeting-notes agent that captures, summarizes and turns calls into action — the personal CoS for knowledge workers.
Granola vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Granola | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $18 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Memory, Tool use, Voice | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class meeting capture UX — quietly takes notes during your normal Zoom/Meet/Teams call
- +AI summaries actually capture action items, not just transcripts
- +iOS app makes voice-memo style capture effortless
- −Assistant tier — surfaces information but doesn't take actions on it
- −Less useful if your work is text-heavy rather than meeting-heavy
- −Per-seat pricing on Business tier scales linearly
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +10 notes/mo
- +Standard transcription
- +Basic summaries
- +Unlimited notes
- +Custom templates
- +Folders + tags
- +iOS app
- +Shared folders
- +Admin controls
- +SSO option
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Granola if its specific capabilities (Memory, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Granola →Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Granola or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Granola if its specific capabilities (Memory, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Granola for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Granola and Magic.dev?+
Granola starts at Freemium · from $18; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Granola or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.