7,000+ app integrations plus an AI agent layer — your existing automation stack, now with planning.
Lindy vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Lindy vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AIAGENTSAffiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Torq?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Torq starts at Subscription. Lindy is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Lindy and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool useMemoryDemo · hover to play
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentBrowser
Demo · hover to play