7,000以上のアプリ連携にAIエージェント層を追加 — 既存の自動化 stack に計画立案機能を加えます。
ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Lindy vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Tool useMemoryVoice
Lindy vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Lindy
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Lindy
メリット
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
デメリット
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Lindy
Free
無料
Trial
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
おすすめ
Starter
$49/月
Individuals
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
Pro
$199/月
Power users / small teams
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Lindy
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AIAGENTSAffiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Torq?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Torq starts at Subscription. Lindy is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Lindy and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ＆ドロップシナリオ。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントブラウザ操作
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Lindy · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison