Magic.dev vs Moveworks: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Magic.dev vs Moveworks — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Moveworks |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 70 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | RAG, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Genuinely measurable deflection on IT tickets (50–80% in deployed customers)
- +Native integration with ServiceNow, Workday, and Slack/Teams
- +Enterprise-grade SSO, audit, and content controls
- −Enterprise-only — minimum seat counts in the thousands
- −Implementation timeline 3–6 months
- −Per-employee pricing can exceed $50/year at scale
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +IT + HR helpdesk agent
- +ServiceNow + Workday integration
- +Slack/Teams native
- +Multi-language
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Magic.dev →Pick Moveworks if its specific capabilities (RAG, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Moveworks →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Moveworks in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Moveworks if its specific capabilities (RAG, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Moveworks for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Moveworks?+
Both Magic.dev and Moveworks start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Moveworks?+
Both Magic.dev and Moveworks are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.