Make.com Agents vs n8n Agents: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI agent nodes — self-host or use cloud.
Make.com Agents vs n8n Agents — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | n8n Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 85 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 6 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Strongest OSS workflow automation in 2026 — production-ready at any scale
- +Self-host keeps proprietary data on your infra
- +Multi-agent + AI agent nodes are first-class, not bolted on
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Cloud pricing is competitive but self-host operational overhead is real
- −Community support primary; commercial SLA is paid tier
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Apache-2.0 fair-use license
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Full agent node support
- +Hosted runtime
- +Active workflows
- +BYO LLM key supported
- +10K executions/mo
- +Multi-user
- +Workflow versioning
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try n8n Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or n8n Agents in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and n8n Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and n8n Agents?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; n8n Agents starts at Free · OSS. n8n Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or n8n Agents?+
Both Make.com Agents and n8n Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.