Make.com Agents vs Relay Agents: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Human-in-the-loop workflow agents that connect 100+ apps with approvals.
Make.com Agents vs Relay Agents — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Relay Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $18 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Strongest human-in-the-loop pattern of any no-code agent
- +Connects 100+ apps with conditional logic and approval gates
- +Free tier is real — not a trial in disguise
- −AI features are lighter than purpose-built agent platforms
- −Per-seat pricing scales fast for larger teams
- −No native phone / voice support
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +200 runs/mo
- +All app integrations
- +2,000 runs/mo
- +Multi-step approvals
- +Conditional branching
- +Shared workflows
- +Audit log
- +Role-based access
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Relay Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Relay Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Relay Agents in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Relay Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Relay Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Relay Agents?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Relay Agents starts at Freemium · from $18. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Relay Agents?+
Both Make.com Agents and Relay Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.