Make.com Agents vs Tines AI: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Make.com Agents vs Tines AI — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Tines AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Strongest human-in-the-loop story for security and IT workflows
- +Generous free tier (Community) is genuinely usable in production
- +Story-based composer is easier to read than YAML/JSON IaC alternatives
- −Narrower scope than Zapier / n8n — built for SecOps + ITOps, less for marketing
- −Sales-led above Community tier; pricing not transparent
- −AI agent features are newer than the core automation product
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Community connectors
- +Public-cloud only
- +Production support
- +Custom connectors
- +On-prem option
- +Multi-region
- +SSO + audit
- +Premium support SLA
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Tines AI in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Tines AI if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Tines AI?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Tines AI starts at Subscription · Free tier. Tines AI is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Tines AI?+
Both Make.com Agents and Tines AI are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.