7,000+ app integrations plus an AI agent layer — your existing automation stack, now with planning.
Make.com Agents vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Make.com Agents vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 85 / 100 (S) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 8
- Polish
- 9
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Torq?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Torq starts at Subscription. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Make.com Agents and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool useMemoryDemo · hover to play
Visual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentBrowser
Demo · hover to play"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Demo · hover to play