Make.com Agents vs Zapier Agents: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
7,000+ app integrations plus an AI agent layer — your existing automation stack, now with planning.
Make.com Agents vs Zapier Agents — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Zapier Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 80 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $20 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 9 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Largest integration catalog on the market (7,000+ apps)
- +Familiar surface area for the millions who already use Zapier
- +Cheap entry tier makes it the natural first agent for any small team
- −Agent capabilities are shallower than purpose-built platforms (Lindy, Relay)
- −Task math gets expensive past the Pro tier
- −Visual editor can feel cluttered for complex agentic loops
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +100 tasks/mo
- +Standard agents
- +Community support
- +750 tasks/mo
- +All AI features
- +Multi-step workflows
- +Shared workflows
- +Premium apps
- +Higher task limits
- +SSO + audit log
- +Advanced admin
- +Custom volume
Which one should you pick?
Pick Zapier Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Zapier Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Zapier Agents in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint. Pick Zapier Agents if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Zapier Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Zapier Agents?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Zapier Agents starts at Freemium · from $20. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Zapier Agents?+
Both Make.com Agents and Zapier Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.