Martin vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Your personal AI chief of staff for inbox, calendar and life admin.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Martin vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Martin | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 70 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $25 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +AGENTS15 coupon makes the math obvious — $21/mo forever
- +Strong on Apple ecosystem (iMessage native)
- +Voice-memo intake feels effortless on iOS
- −Microsoft 365 integration is the weak spot
- −No team plan; truly a personal assistant only
- −Limited custom workflow builder vs Lindy
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Inbox + calendar
- +Voice memo intake
- +iMessage integration
- +AGENTS15 coupon: $21/mo forever
- +Higher message limits
- +Custom workflows
- +Priority support
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Claim AGENTS15Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Martin or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Martin for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Martin and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Martin starts at Subscription · from $25; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Martin or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Martin and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.