Build durable agents that act on your internal data — open framework.
n8n Agents vs Sycamorewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI agent nodes — self-host or use cloud.
n8n Agents vs Sycamore — specs
| Spec | n8n Agents | Sycamore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 87 / 100 (S) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 6 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2026 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 10
- Polish
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 6
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Strongest OSS workflow automation in 2026 — production-ready at any scale
- +Self-host keeps proprietary data on your infra
- +Multi-agent + AI agent nodes are first-class, not bolted on
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Cloud pricing is competitive but self-host operational overhead is real
- −Community support primary; commercial SLA is paid tier
- +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
- +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
- +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
- −Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
- −No public pricing — sales-led motion
- −Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget
Pricing
- +Apache-2.0 fair-use license
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Full agent node support
- +Hosted runtime
- +Active workflows
- +BYO LLM key supported
- +10K executions/mo
- +Multi-user
- +Workflow versioning
- +Agent OS core
- +Standard integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Trust + memory layers
- +Strategic CS
- +On-prem deployment
- +Dedicated engineering
- +Custom integrations
Which one should you pick?
Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try n8n Agents →Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sycamore →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick n8n Agents or Sycamore in 2026?+
Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use n8n Agents for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between n8n Agents and Sycamore?+
n8n Agents starts at Free · OSS; Sycamore starts at Subscription. n8n Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, n8n Agents or Sycamore?+
Both n8n Agents and Sycamore are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing n8n Agents and Sycamore also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool useRAGMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to play
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to play"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Demo · hover to play