Parloa vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Voice agents for contact centers — handles tier-1 calls end-to-end.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Parloa vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Parloa | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 63 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Voice, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best voice agent in the category — latency, naturalness, multilingual
- +Strong telephony integration (Twilio, Vonage, Genesys)
- +Clean human handoff preserves full transcript + classified intent
- −Voice-first — chat experience is secondary
- −Sales-led, no transparent pricing
- −Less effective on long-tail languages outside the supported 12
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Voice agents (12+ languages)
- +Telephony integration (Twilio / Genesys)
- +Human handoff preserves transcript + intent
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Parloa if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Parloa →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Parloa or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Parloa if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Parloa for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Parloa and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Parloa starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Parloa is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Parloa or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Parloa is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.