Reclaim.ai vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI calendar assistant — auto-schedules focus time, tasks, habits, and meetings around your priorities.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Reclaim.ai vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Reclaim.ai | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $10 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Smartest auto-scheduler we have tested — defends focus time aggressively
- +Integrations with task tools (Asana, Linear, Todoist) make it a real planning hub
- +Free tier is genuinely useful for personal users
- −Calendar-only scope — does not handle email or task generation
- −Best for Google Workspace users; Outlook support is newer
- −Team rituals feature requires manager buy-in to land
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Basic habits + tasks
- +1 calendar
- +Smart 1:1s
- +Tasks integrations
- +Multiple calendars
- +Team rituals
- +Smart scheduling links
- +Admin controls
- +SSO
- +Audit logs
- +Dedicated CS
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Reclaim.ai if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Reclaim.ai →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Reclaim.ai or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Reclaim.ai if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Reclaim.ai for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Reclaim.ai and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Reclaim.ai starts at Freemium · from $10; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Reclaim.ai or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Reclaim.ai and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.