Reclaim.ai vs Sweep: 2026 comparison
AI calendar assistant — auto-schedules focus time, tasks, habits, and meetings around your priorities.
Reclaim.ai vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | Reclaim.ai | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $10 | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Smartest auto-scheduler we have tested — defends focus time aggressively
- +Integrations with task tools (Asana, Linear, Todoist) make it a real planning hub
- +Free tier is genuinely useful for personal users
- −Calendar-only scope — does not handle email or task generation
- −Best for Google Workspace users; Outlook support is newer
- −Team rituals feature requires manager buy-in to land
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
- +Basic habits + tasks
- +1 calendar
- +Smart 1:1s
- +Tasks integrations
- +Multiple calendars
- +Team rituals
- +Smart scheduling links
- +Admin controls
- +SSO
- +Audit logs
- +Dedicated CS
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Reclaim.ai if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Reclaim.ai →Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Sweep →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Reclaim.ai or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick Reclaim.ai if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Reclaim.ai for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Reclaim.ai and Sweep?+
Reclaim.ai starts at Freemium · from $10; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Reclaim.ai is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Reclaim.ai or Sweep?+
Sweep is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.