Rox vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Account research agents that prep your AEs before every call.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Rox vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Rox | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 60 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $129 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, RAG, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Cuts AE prep from an hour to five minutes per call
- +Strong Gong integration surfaces context from prior calls
- +Delivered where AEs already work (Slack + Salesforce)
- −Quality depends on account size — thin for tiny companies
- −No interactive mode; reports are one-shot
- −Per-seat pricing adds up fast on big teams
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Account research briefs
- +Gong integration
- +Slack delivery
- +Custom research depth
- +Salesforce sync
- +Dedicated CS
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Rox or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Rox if its specific capabilities (Browser, RAG) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Rox for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Rox and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Rox starts at Subscription · from $129; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Rox or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Rox and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.