Shortwave vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI email client — natural-language search, summary, scheduled send, and AI-drafted replies grounded in your inbox.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Shortwave vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Shortwave | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best AI-native email client in 2026 — search, summarize, draft all natural-language
- +Built specifically for Gmail; faster + smarter than Gmail itself
- +Cheap relative to Superhuman with better AI features
- −Gmail-only — no Outlook support
- −AI assistant is helpful but not yet revolutionary
- −Smaller user base means fewer integrations than Gmail/Outlook ecosystems
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Basic AI summary
- +90-day search
- +Unlimited search
- +AI assistant
- +Scheduled send
- +Shared inboxes
- +Send delegation
- +Admin controls
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Shortwave if its specific capabilities (RAG, Memory) match what you need.
Try Shortwave →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Shortwave or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Shortwave if its specific capabilities (RAG, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Shortwave for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Shortwave and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Shortwave and Sourcegraph Cody start in the same pricing range (Freemium · from $9 vs Freemium · from $9). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Shortwave or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Sourcegraph Cody is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.