Open-Source-Framework zur Orchestrierung von rollenspielenden autonomen KI-Agenten in kollaborativen Crews.
Multi-AgentTool-NutzungMemory
Demo · hover to play
AutoGen vs Sardinewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory
AutoGen vs Sardine — specs
| Spec | AutoGen | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Code, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 2
- Preise
- 10
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 7
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Sardine
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 6
- Preise
- 4
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
AutoGen
Sardine
Pros
- +$145M total (a16z) — top of the agentic financial-crime category
- +Consolidates 11 fraud/KYC/AML vendors into one platform
- +Auto-reviews 40% of monthly applications — major cost reduction
Cons
- −Enterprise focus — not priced for SMB fintechs
- −Regulatory complexity requires legal review per deployment
- −Best ROI requires existing high-volume transaction flow
Pricing
AutoGen
Sardine
Growth
Individuell
Mid-market fintechs
- +Fraud + AML core agents
- +4 integrations
- +Standard SLA
Empfohlen
Enterprise
Individuell
Large banks + fintechs
- +Full agent suite
- +Unlimited integrations
- +Custom rules engine
Sovereign
Individuell
Regulated
- +EU/US data residency
- +On-prem option
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
AutoGen
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try AutoGen →Sardine
Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sardine →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick AutoGen or Sardine in 2026?+
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Sardine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between AutoGen and Sardine?+
AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Sardine starts at Subscription. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Sardine?+
Both AutoGen and Sardine are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing AutoGen and Sardine also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
LangChain's zustandsbehaftetes Multi-Agent-Framework — graphbasierte Orchestrierung mit Persistenz und Human-in-the-Loop.
Multi-AgentTool-NutzungMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's leichtgewichtige Multi-Agent-Referenzimplementierung — Handoff- und Routine-Muster, zu Bildungszwecken.
Multi-AgentTool-Nutzung
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to AutoGen · alternatives to Sardine
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison