Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Dust vs Outreachwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Dust vs Outreach — specs
| Spec | Dust | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 78 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Voice, Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 6
- Preise
- 9
- Reife
- 6
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
- +Most-deployed sales engagement platform — proven at scale
- +AI features now span engagement + forecasting + coaching
- +Strongest enterprise integration story (Salesforce native)
- −No transparent self-serve pricing
- −AI features still trail dedicated tools (Regie, Lavender) in quality
- −Large-org implementation timeline 6–12 weeks
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
- +Engagement sequences
- +AI sentiment + topic detection
- +Smart sequences
- +Deal Insights
- +Pipeline forecasting
- +Custom AI models
- +Advanced reporting
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Outreach if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Outreach →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Outreach in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Outreach if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Outreach for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Outreach?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Outreach starts at Subscription · Free tier. Outreach is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Outreach?+
Both Dust and Outreach are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and Outreach also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Demo · hover to playVisuelle Workflow-Automatisierung mit KI-Agenten – Drag-and-Drop-Szenarien für 2.000+ Apps.
Tool-NutzungMemoryMulti-AgentDemo · hover to play