Über 7.000 App-Integrationen plus eine KI-Agenten-Schicht – Ihr bestehender Automatisierungs-Stack, jetzt mit Planungsfunktion.
Lindy vs Sardinewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Lindy vs Sardine — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 8
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 6
- Preise
- 4
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
- +$145M total (a16z) — top of the agentic financial-crime category
- +Consolidates 11 fraud/KYC/AML vendors into one platform
- +Auto-reviews 40% of monthly applications — major cost reduction
- −Enterprise focus — not priced for SMB fintechs
- −Regulatory complexity requires legal review per deployment
- −Best ROI requires existing high-volume transaction flow
Pricing
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
- +Fraud + AML core agents
- +4 integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Full agent suite
- +Unlimited integrations
- +Custom rules engine
- +EU/US data residency
- +On-prem option
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AIAGENTSPick Sardine if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sardine →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Sardine in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sardine if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Sardine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Sardine?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Sardine starts at Subscription. Lindy is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Sardine?+
Sardine is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Lindy and Sardine also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool-NutzungMemoryDemo · hover to play
Visuelle Workflow-Automatisierung mit KI-Agenten – Drag-and-Drop-Szenarien für 2.000+ Apps.
Tool-NutzungMemoryMulti-AgentDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
Tool-NutzungMemoryMulti-AgentBrowser-Nutzung
Demo · hover to play