aiagentrank.io
Abonnieren

Sourcegraph Cody vs Torqwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?

Sourcegraph Cody

Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousFreemium · from $9
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Torq

Hyperautomation + agentic SOC for autonomous threat response — Forbes "de facto leader".

⚙️OpsAutonomousSubscription
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent

Sourcegraph Cody vs Torq — specs

SpecSourcegraph CodyTorq
Agent Rank77 / 100 (A)67 / 100 (B)
AutonomySemi-autonomousAutonomous
PricingFreemium · from $9Subscription
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesCode, Tool use, RAG, MemoryTool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent
Integrations4 apps5 apps
VerifiedVerified—
ReleasedFeb 2025Jan 2025

Categories: Sourcegraph Cody → Code · Torq → Ops

Agent Rank breakdown

Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomie
8
Fähigkeiten
8
Integrationen
4
Preise
8
Reife
8
Verifizierbarkeit
10

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomie
9
Fähigkeiten
8
Integrationen
6
Preise
4
Reife
7
Verifizierbarkeit
6

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Pros & cons

Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
  • +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
  • +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
  • +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Cons
  • −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
  • −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Torq
Pros
  • +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
  • +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
  • +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
Cons
  • −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
  • −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
  • −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate

Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Kostenlos
Personal use
  • +Limited chat + completions
  • +Public repos only
Empfohlen
Pro
$9/Mo.
Solo devs
  • +Unlimited usage
  • +Larger context
  • +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/Sitz/Mo.
Engineering teams
  • +Code search across monorepos
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SSO + audit
Torq
Pro
Individuell
Mid-market SOC
  • +Agentic workflows
  • +100+ integrations
  • +Standard SLA
Empfohlen
Enterprise
Individuell
Large SOC
  • +Unlimited agents
  • +Custom playbooks
  • +Strategic CS
Sovereign
Individuell
Regulated
  • +Air-gapped deployment
  • +EU/US data residency
  • +Dedicated engineering

Which one should you pick?

Sourcegraph Cody

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.

Try Sourcegraph Cody →
Torq

Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try Torq →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Torq in 2026?+

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Torq?+

Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Torq starts at Subscription. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Torq?+

Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Torq also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • Augment Codev2A75

    Autonomer Coding-KI-Agent, verankert in Ihrer gesamten Codebasis — Multi-File-Bearbeitungen mit tiefem Kontextverständnis.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomFreemium · ab 30 $
    CodeausführungTool-NutzungMemoryRAG
    77k8. Apr. 2024augmentcode.com
    Start Augment free
    Demo · hover to play
  • Amazon Qv2A80

    Der Enterprise-KI-Agent von AWS – Coding-Assistent, Business-Chat und anpassbare Q-Apps auf Basis Ihrer AWS-Daten.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomAbonnement · ab 19 $
    CodeausführungTool-NutzungRAGMemory
    89k2. Apr. 2025aws.amazon.com
    Amazon Q testen
    Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Torq (2026): which AI code agent wins? · AI Agent Rank