Décomposition de l'Agent Rank
- Autonomie
- 8
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 8
- Tarification
- 7
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 10
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Capacités
- Tool Use
- Memory
- Voix
Intégrations
- Messaging
- Slack
- Gmail
- Calendar
- Google Calendar
- CRM
- HubSpot
Niveaux de tarification
- +400 tasks/mois
- +Toutes les intégrations
- +Builder visuel complet
- +5 000 tasks/mois
- +Intégrations CRM
- +Mémoire avancée
- +30 000 tasks/mois
- +Multi-utilisateurs
- +Support prioritaire
Our take on Lindy
Lindy positions itself as "AI employees you can hire in minutes." After running real workflows for two months, we found it's more accurately described as the best no-code agent builder in the category — strong primitives, occasionally rough edges.
- +True no-code builder — non-developers can ship working agents in an afternoon
- +Library of pre-built "Lindies" for common use cases (meeting notes, lead follow-up, inbox triage)
- +Voice agent support that handles real phone calls competently
- +Integrates with 100+ apps via direct connectors, not just Zapier
- −Pricing tiers gate the most useful features behind higher plans
- −Complex multi-step workflows hit reliability issues — Lindy will sometimes skip steps
- −Visual builder is great for simple flows but unwieldy past ~10 nodes
- −You can't easily version-control or diff your Lindies
- ·Founders running solo who need an inbox concierge, sales follow-up bot, and meeting scribe
- ·Ops teams automating repetitive cross-app workflows without engineering help
- ·Internal use cases — customer-facing voice agents need more polish
- ·Sales is aggressive — expect outreach if you sign up for the trial
- ·The $49 Starter plan is limited; meaningful use cases require Pro ($199+/mo)
The "AI employee" framing
Lindy markets itself as "hire an AI employee." This is partly accurate marketing, partly aspirational. What you actually get is a visual workflow builder with LLM-powered nodes, integrated calendar/email/CRM connectors, and a voice channel that bridges to phone calls.
The framing matters because expectations shape adoption. If you come in expecting to "hire" something that figures out a job on its own, you'll be frustrated. If you come in expecting to assemble a useful agent from primitives in an afternoon, you'll be impressed.
What works well
Three specific scenarios where Lindy consistently delivers:
-
Inbox triage and reply drafting. Connect Gmail, define rules ("if it's a vendor pitch, archive; if it's a customer, draft a reply in my voice"), and Lindy quietly does the work. Catches >80% of low-stakes email after a week of feedback.
-
Meeting prep + notes. Pre-meeting briefing on attendees from your CRM, in-meeting recording + transcription, post-meeting action items synced to Linear or Asana. Replaces 2-3 separate tools.
-
Voice agents for outbound calls. Hand it a list, let it call to confirm appointments or do qualification interviews. We were skeptical until we heard it — the voice quality and handling of interruptions is genuinely good.
Where the seams show
A few hard-earned observations:
-
Multi-step reliability falls off after ~6 nodes. A flow that goes email → research → draft → schedule → notify is fine. A flow that adds 3 more steps starts to fail intermittently. Break complex flows into sub-Lindies that call each other.
-
No source control. Your workflows live in Lindy's cloud. There's no Git, no diff view, no rollback. Make incremental changes; document them externally.
-
Cold-start prompts vary in quality. Two engineers can describe the same workflow and get noticeably different results. Iterate, don't ship draft one.
Pricing reality
The cheapest plan ($49/mo) is too limited to evaluate seriously — 3,000 tasks and one workflow. The Pro tier ($199/mo) is where the product becomes useful: unlimited workflows, 30,000 tasks, voice minutes included. Business is $599+, mainly for usage tier increases.
For a solo founder, the math is: if Lindy saves you 5 hours/month at $100/hour of effective opportunity cost, the Pro plan pays for itself 2.5×. For most users who'd use it daily, this holds.
Our coupon AIAGENTS covers the first month if you're trialing.
Bottom line
Lindy is the right tool when you know what you want automated and want to build it yourself without engineers. It's not the right tool if you want to describe a job in natural language and have an agent figure out how to do it — for that, look at Manus or vertical agents. But for "build me an inbox helper that emails me at 6pm with everything I missed," Lindy is hard to beat.
Plateforme no-code pour construire des agents IA personnalisés en minutes. Commencez avec le tier abonnement.
Questions fréquentes
Que peut faire Lindy ?+
Lindy excelle aux workflows ops récurrents : triage d'inbox, planification de meetings, enrichissement de CRM, follow-ups sales, support tier-1. Le builder visuel permet à n'importe qui de construire un agent en 30 minutes au lieu d'écrire du code. Idéal pour fondateurs solo, petites équipes et opérateurs sans engineers.
Lindy ou Zapier ?+
Lindy est natif-IA (chaque step peut être un appel LLM) ; Zapier est natif-règles (steps déterministes, IA en add-on). Pour les workflows où les décisions nécessitent du jugement (« est-ce email important ? », « ce lead vaut-il une réponse ? »), Lindy gagne. Pour des chaînes purement déterministes (when X happens, do Y), Zapier reste plus fiable et moins cher.
Lindy vaut-il 49 $/mois ?+
Si vous gagnez 1+ heure par semaine en automatisation d'inbox/calendrier/CRM, oui — l'amortissement est immédiat. Le tier Free (400 tasks/mois) suffit pour tester. Passez au Pro quand vous dépassez 400 tasks ou avez besoin d'intégrations CRM.
Reviews utilisateurs
Écrire une review →Be the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
