コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playAmazon Q vs Torqwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Amazon Q vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Amazon Q | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 80 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $19 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Amazon Q
Agent Rank
80/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Amazon Q
メリット
- +Best Java + .NET migration features in any coding agent (Q Developer Transformation)
- +Native AWS data grounding — answers questions about your specific cloud environment
- +Per-seat pricing is competitive with GitHub Copilot Business
デメリット
- −Weaker outside AWS environments
- −Q Business is a different product from Q Developer — confusion is common
- −Less polished IDE experience than Cursor or GitHub Copilot
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Amazon Q
Free tier
無料
Light use
- +Limited Q Developer chat
- +AWS console access
おすすめ
Q Developer Pro
$19/席/月
Developers
- +Inline completions
- +Code transformation
- +Customizations
Q Business
$20/席/月
Knowledge workers
- +Custom Q apps
- +AWS data grounding
- +Plugin support
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Amazon Q
Pick Amazon Q if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Amazon Q →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Amazon Q or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Amazon Q if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Amazon Q for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Amazon Q and Torq?+
Amazon Q starts at Subscription · from $19; Torq starts at Subscription. Amazon Q is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Amazon Q or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Amazon Q and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
エンタープライズ向けコードインテリジェンスエージェント — コードに関する質問に回答し、大規模モノレポをナビゲート。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playGitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Amazon Q · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison