Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Dust vs Paradoxwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Dust vs Paradox — specs
| Spec | Dust | Paradox |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Voice |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Paradox
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Dust
メリット
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
デメリット
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Paradox
メリット
- +Best-fit AI worker for high-volume hourly hiring (retail, hospitality, healthcare)
- +Olivia handles SMS + chat conversations natively — meets candidates where they are
- +Genuine 40–60% reduction in time-to-hire at deployed customers
デメリット
- −Less differentiated for low-volume executive hiring
- −Enterprise sales motion — no self-serve option
- −Requires ATS integration setup (Workday, Greenhouse, etc.)
Pricing
Dust
Free
無料
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
おすすめ
Pro
$29/席/月
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Paradox
Enterprise
カスタム
Mid-market and enterprise hiring orgs
- +Olivia conversational agent
- +High-volume hiring workflows
- +ATS integrations
- +SMS + chat + email
Which one should you pick?
Paradox
Pick Paradox if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Paradox →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Paradox in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Paradox if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Paradox for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Paradox?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Paradox starts at Subscription · Free tier. Paradox is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Paradox?+
Paradox is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Dust and Paradox also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to playAIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ＆ドロップシナリオ。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Dust · alternatives to Paradox
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison