7,000以上のアプリ連携にAIエージェント層を追加 — 既存の自動化 stack に計画立案機能を加えます。
ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Lindy vs Sycamorewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Tool useMemoryVoice
Lindy vs Sycamore — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Sycamore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Lindy
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Sycamore
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Lindy
メリット
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
デメリット
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
Sycamore
メリット
- +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
- +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
- +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
デメリット
- −Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
- −No public pricing — sales-led motion
- −Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget
Pricing
Lindy
Free
無料
Trial
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
おすすめ
Starter
$49/月
Individuals
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
Pro
$199/月
Power users / small teams
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
Sycamore
Team
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Agent OS core
- +Standard integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Trust + memory layers
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +On-prem deployment
- +Dedicated engineering
- +Custom integrations
Which one should you pick?
Lindy
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AIAGENTSSycamore
Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sycamore →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Sycamore in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Sycamore?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Sycamore starts at Subscription. Lindy is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Sycamore?+
Both Lindy and Sycamore are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Lindy and Sycamore also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ＆ドロップシナリオ。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントブラウザ操作
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Lindy · alternatives to Sycamore
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison