"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to playLinear Agent vs Numericwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
AI agent inside Linear — triages issues, drafts engineering specs, runs cross-team workflows on tickets.
Tool useRAGMemory
Linear Agent vs Numeric — specs
| Spec | Linear Agent | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $8 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Linear Agent
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Numeric
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Linear Agent
メリット
- +Native to Linear — zero extra setup for teams already using it
- +Triage and spec-drafting genuinely save time on issue grooming
- +Pricing folds AI features into the existing Linear seat
デメリット
- −Only useful if you live in Linear
- −Less powerful than dedicated coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code) for code work
- −Agent autonomy bounded by Linear-specific tasks
Numeric
メリット
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
デメリット
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
Pricing
Linear Agent
Free
無料
Small teams (≤10 users)
- +Basic Linear
- +Limited AI features
おすすめ
Standard
$8/席/月
Growing teams
- +Full Linear + AI Agent
- +Issue triage
- +Spec drafting
Business
$14/席/月
Larger orgs
- +SAML SSO
- +SCIM
- +Advanced analytics
Numeric
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market finance teams
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large finance orgs
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
Which one should you pick?
Linear Agent
Pick Linear Agent if its specific capabilities (Tool use, RAG) match what you need.
Try Linear Agent →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Linear Agent or Numeric in 2026?+
Pick Linear Agent if its specific capabilities (Tool use, RAG) match what you need. Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Linear Agent for primary work and Numeric for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Linear Agent and Numeric?+
Linear Agent starts at Subscription · from $8; Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Linear Agent or Numeric?+
Both Linear Agent and Numeric are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Linear Agent and Numeric also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェントMicrosoft のAIワークアシスタント — Word、Excel、Outlook、Teams、Microsoft 365 Stack 全体にわたるエージェント。
ツール利用RAGメモリビジョンDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Linear Agent · alternatives to Numeric
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison