エンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Magic.dev vs Replit Agentwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
CodeTool useMemory
Build and ship full applications from a single prompt — runs in the Replit cloud.
CodeTool useBrowserMemory
Magic.dev vs Replit Agent — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Replit Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Replit Agent
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 9
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Magic.dev
メリット
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
デメリット
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Replit Agent
メリット
- +Ships full deployed apps from one prompt — fastest 0-to-production agent
- +Cloud-native: no local setup, no env hell, instant collaboration
- +Strong for non-engineers prototyping ideas
デメリット
- −Tied to Replit cloud — bringing the code home requires manual export
- −Less control over architectural choices than IDE-native agents
- −Effort-point math at heavy use can surprise
Pricing
Magic.dev
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Replit Agent
おすすめ
Starter
$25/月
Solo builders
- +Replit cloud workspace
- +Auto-deploy + previews
- +500 effort points / mo
Core
$35/月
Heavy builders
- +1,500 effort points
- +Higher model tier
- +Priority queue
Teams
$40/席/月
Teams
- +Shared workspaces
- +Custom domains
- +Role-based access
Which one should you pick?
Replit Agent
Pick Replit Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Replit Agent →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Replit Agent in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Pick Replit Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Replit Agent for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Replit Agent?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; Replit Agent starts at Subscription · from $25. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Replit Agent?+
Both Magic.dev and Replit Agent are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Magic.dev and Replit Agent also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GitHubの自然言語マイクロアプリビルダー — 個人用アプリを説明するだけで、デプロイ済みの動作バージョンを取得できます。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to playAutonomous "Droid" agent for end-to-end engineering with native AGENTS.md support.
コード実行ツール利用メモリマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Magic.dev · alternatives to Replit Agent
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison