AIカスタマーサービスエージェント — チャット・メール・音声を横断してチケットを解決し、測定可能な自動解決率を実現します。
RAGツール利用メモリ音声
Demo · hover to play
Sierra vs Torqwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Branded customer-facing agents from the founders of Salesforce + Google.
VoiceTool useMemoryRAG
Sierra vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Sierra | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Voice, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Sierra
Agent Rank
78/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Sierra
メリット
- +Best-in-class for branded customer-facing agents (voice + chat parity)
- +Concierge onboarding from one of the strongest teams in AI
- +Indistinguishable-from-human quality in tier-1 deployments
デメリット
- −Enterprise-only pricing — typical contracts $150–500k/year
- −Deployment is white-glove, not SaaS — multi-week setup
- −Overkill for SMB or mid-market support volumes
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Sierra
おすすめ
Branded agent
カスタム
Enterprise
- +Voice + chat
- +Custom persona
- +White-glove implementation
- +SOC 2 II + HIPAA option
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Sierra
Pick Sierra if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sierra →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sierra or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Sierra if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Sierra for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sierra and Torq?+
Sierra starts at Subscription · Free tier; Torq starts at Subscription. Sierra is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sierra or Torq?+
Both Sierra and Torq are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Sierra and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Multilingual customer-support AI agents with local deployment teams in 30 countries.
ツール利用メモリ音声RAGForrester Wave Leader 2026 — enterprise voice and chat agent platform (now NiCE Cognigy).
ツール利用音声メモリRAG
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sierra · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison