aiagentrank.io

Sourcegraph Cody vs Sycamorewhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?

Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousFreemium · from $9
CodeTool useRAGMemory

Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.

⚙️OpsSemi-autonomousSubscription
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent

Sourcegraph Cody vs Sycamore — specs

SpecSourcegraph CodySycamore
Agent Rank77 / 100 (A)67 / 100 (B)
AutonomySemi-autonomousSemi-autonomous
PricingFreemium · from $9Subscription
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesCode, Tool use, RAG, MemoryTool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent
Integrations4 apps4 apps
VerifiedVerified
ReleasedFeb 2025Mar 2026

Categories: Sourcegraph CodyCode · SycamoreOps

Agent Rank breakdown

Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
自律性
8
機能
8
連携
4
料金
8
完成度
8
検証性
10

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Sycamore
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
自律性
8
機能
8
連携
8
料金
4
完成度
6
検証性
6

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Pros & cons

Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
  • +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
  • +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
  • +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
  • Editor experience less polished than Cursor
  • Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Sycamore
メリット
  • +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
  • +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
  • +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
デメリット
  • Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
  • No public pricing — sales-led motion
  • Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget

Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
  • +Limited chat + completions
  • +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/
Solo devs
  • +Unlimited usage
  • +Larger context
  • +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
  • +Code search across monorepos
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SSO + audit
Sycamore
Team
カスタム
Engineering teams
  • +Agent OS core
  • +Standard integrations
  • +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
  • +Multi-agent coordination
  • +Trust + memory layers
  • +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
  • +On-prem deployment
  • +Dedicated engineering
  • +Custom integrations

Which one should you pick?

Sourcegraph Cody

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.

Try Sourcegraph Cody →
Sycamore

Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.

Try Sycamore →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Sycamore in 2026?+

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sycamore if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Sycamore?+

Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Sycamore starts at Subscription. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Sycamore?+

Both Sourcegraph Cody and Sycamore are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.

Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Sycamore also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。

    💻開発半自律型フリーミアム · $30〜
    コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
    77k2024年4月8日augmentcode.com
    Demo · hover to play
  • AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。

    💻開発半自律型サブスクリプション · $19〜
    コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリ
    89k2025年4月2日aws.amazon.com
    Demo · hover to play
  • GitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。

    💻開発半自律型サブスクリプション · $10〜
    コード実行ツール利用メモリ
    318k2025年2月12日github.com
    Demo · hover to play
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Sycamore (2026): which AI code agent wins? · AI Agent Rank