コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playSourcegraph Cody vs Tabninewhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Tabnine
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Tabnine
メリット
- +Strongest privacy story in the coding-agent category — fully self-hostable
- +Models can be fine-tuned on your private codebase without sending data out
- +Long history of enterprise deployments in regulated industries
デメリット
- −Capability gap vs frontier models in chat/agent quality
- −Less polished UX than Cursor or GitHub Copilot
- −Per-seat pricing at Enterprise is high vs alternatives
Pricing
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/月
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Tabnine
Dev
$9/月
Individual devs
- +AI completions
- +Chat agent
- +Privacy mode
おすすめ
Enterprise
$39/席/月
Privacy-sensitive teams
- +Self-hosted
- +Air-gapped option
- +Custom-trained models on your code
Which one should you pick?
Sourcegraph Cody
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Tabnine in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Tabnine if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Tabnine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine?+
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine start in the same pricing range (Freemium · from $9 vs Freemium · from $9). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Tabnine?+
Sourcegraph Cody is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playGitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody · alternatives to Tabnine
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison