Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Continue | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Continue and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.