11x vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
AI digital workers for sales — Alice (SDR), Mike (SDR), and Jordan (CSM) handle full-cycle outbound.
11x vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | 11x | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $700 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Genuine "AI employee" framing — agents have names, roles, and measurable output
- +Books real meetings autonomously at lower fully-loaded cost than a human SDR
- +Multi-channel sequences (email, LinkedIn) without separate tools
- −Meeting quality is lower-tier than top human SDRs for nuanced ICPs
- −$700/mo entry is real money for solo founders pre-revenue
- −Best on volume-driven outbound; weaker on highly targeted ABM
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Alice (AI SDR)
- +~5,000 contacts/mo
- +Email + LinkedIn outbound
- +Slack alerts
- +Alice + Mike (AI SDR pair)
- +~15,000 contacts/mo
- +CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot)
- +Multi-channel sequences
- +Alice + Mike + Jordan (CSM)
- +Custom volumes
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Dedicated CS engineer
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick 11x or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick 11x if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use 11x for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between 11x and Magic.dev?+
11x starts at Subscription · from $700; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, 11x or Magic.dev?+
Both 11x and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.