Browser-driving agent that completes web tasks autonomously — booking, shopping, research.
Adept vs Dustwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Dust — specs
| Spec | Adept | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 9
- Polish
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Dust in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Dust for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Dust?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Dust starts at Subscription · from $29. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Dust?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Adept and Dust also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- BrowserTool useVisionMemoryDemo · hover to play
Claude with computer-use capability — sees the screen, moves cursor, types, navigates apps autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemory
Demo · hover to playPersonal AI agent that browses the web for you — books flights, fills forms, completes tasks autonomously.
BrowserTool useVisionMemoryDemo · hover to play