Webタスクを自律的に完了するブラウザ操作AIエージェント — 予約、購入、リサーチに対応。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to play
Adept vs Dustwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
BrowserTool useMemoryVision
Adept vs Dust — specs
| Spec | Adept | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 4
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Adept
メリット
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
デメリット
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Dust
メリット
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
デメリット
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Pricing
Adept
Enterprise preview
カスタム
Enterprise pilots
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
Dust
Free
無料
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
おすすめ
Pro
$29/席/月
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
Adept
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Dust in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Dust for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Dust?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Dust starts at Subscription · from $29. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Dust?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Adept and Dust also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
画面を認識し、カーソルを動かし、入力や操作を自律的に実行するコンピューター操作機能を備えたClaude。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to playあなたに代わってウェブを閲覧するパーソナルAIエージェント — フライトの予約、フォームの入力、タスクの自律的な完了が可能です。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Adept · alternatives to Dust
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison