Apollo.io AI vs Make.com Agents: 2026 comparison
Sales intelligence AI — 275M contact database plus AI sequences, dialer, and deal management.
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Apollo.io AI vs Make.com Agents — specs
| Spec | Apollo.io AI | Make.com Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 83 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $59 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 8 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 6
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Biggest contact database among self-serve sales platforms (275M+)
- +Bundles prospecting + dialer + sequences + CRM in one tool
- +AI features now genuinely useful — sequence generation and lead scoring
- −Data quality varies by region — strong US, weaker emerging markets
- −AI features less mature than dedicated tools (Regie, Lavender)
- −Self-serve pricing higher than competitors for full feature access
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
Pricing
- +60 credits/mo
- +Basic search
- +Email sequencing
- +900 credits/user/mo
- +Verified mobile numbers
- +Workflows + AI sequences
- +Dialer
- +Conversation intelligence
- +Advanced reports
- +Custom roles
- +API access
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
Which one should you pick?
Pick Apollo.io AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Apollo.io AI →Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Apollo.io AI or Make.com Agents in 2026?+
Pick Apollo.io AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Most working teams running both can use Apollo.io AI for primary work and Make.com Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Apollo.io AI and Make.com Agents?+
Apollo.io AI starts at Freemium · from $59; Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Apollo.io AI or Make.com Agents?+
Both Apollo.io AI and Make.com Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.