AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Demo · hover to play
Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Augment Code
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Augment Code
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Cons
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
Augment Code
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Free
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
Recommended
Pro
$9/mo
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/seat/mo
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Augment Code
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Augment Code →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemoryDemo · hover to playCodeium's AI editor — Cascade agent flows alongside in-line completion and chat.
CodeTool useMemoryBrowserDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Augment Code · alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison