AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class context engine (200K tokens) — handles monoliths competitors choke on
- +Native AGENTS.md spec-driven workflow with multi-agent "Intent" orchestration
- +70.6% on SWE-Bench Verified — top of the public coding-agent leaderboard
- −Enterprise focus = pricier than Cursor for solo devs
- −Less hands-off than fully-autonomous Devin/Factory Droid
- −Web/UI changes ship slower than IDE-first competitors
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +25 messages/month
- +VS Code + JetBrains
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited messages
- +200K Context Engine
- +Private repos
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated CS
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Augment Code →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to play
GitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to playCodiumのAIエディタ — インライン補完とチャットに加え、Cascade エージェントフローを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリブラウザ操作Demo · hover to play